Doddridge County Roots

A West Virginia Genealogy

First Name Last Name
Home Search Login  
Share Print Bookmark
Dora JENKINS

Dora JENKINS

Female 1869 -

Personal Information    |    Sources    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Dora JENKINS 
    Born Mar 1869  [1] 
    • Age 18 given at time of Dec 1886 marriage puts birth date at about 1868, but age 34 at time of Dec 1892 marriage would put it at about 1858. 1900 Census of Marion Co WV, enumerated on June 11 1900, shows age as 31and specifies birth date as March 1869.
    Gender Female 
    Census 1900  Grant District, Marion Co, WV Find all individuals with events at this location 
    Person ID I54552  Doddridge County Roots
    Last Modified 29 Nov 2008 

    Family 1 George DEEM,   b. CA 1862 
    Married 24 Dec 1886  Ritchie Co, WV Find all individuals with events at this location  [2] 
    Divorced Y  [3] 
    Children 
     1. Samuel DEEM,   b. Feb 1888
     2. Laura V. DEEM,   b. Nov 1889
    Family ID F22551  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    Family 2 William G. MAZE,   b. Nov 1869  [4] 
    Married 25 Dec 1892  Ritchie Co, WV Find all individuals with events at this location  [5] 
    Children 
     1. Fanny MAZE,   b. 1892
     2. Viola MAZE,   b. Aug 1894
     3. Harry V. MAZE,   b. 26 May 1896,   d. 2 May 1965, Ritchie Co, WV Find all individuals with events at this location  (Age 68 years)
    Family ID F22550  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

  • Sources 
    1. [S2246] 1900 Census, Marion County, WV.

    2. [S1630] Ritchie County WV Marriages 1843-1915, (Wes Cochran, 2515 10th Ave, Parkersburg WV 26101 (July 1985)).
      Identified as George Deem, 24, b. Virginia, res. Ritchie Co; and Dora Jenkins, 18, of Ritchie Co. Married Dec 24 1886.

    3. [S1967] Record of wife's remarriage.

    4. [S1604] Death record of son.

    5. [S1630] Ritchie County WV Marriages 1843-1915, (Wes Cochran, 2515 10th Ave, Parkersburg WV 26101 (July 1985)).
      Identified as William Maze, 34, of Ritchie Co; and Dora Deem, divorced, 34, of Ritchie Co. Married Dec 25 1892. The ages reported for both parties may be the result of a transcription error, since they have been found to be ten years older than they should be.